Daniel Lepage on Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:20:07 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: Fwd: [Spoon-business] PGo 


On Aug 3, 2004, at 1.17 PM, Iain Scott wrote:


At 17:49 03/08/04, you wrote:


On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:02:20PM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> Just to make it all legal and whatnot:
Why is this legal? You just erased four stones. Or were they all played 
illegally?
Arguably so, as they all used representations of the board which had bds stone on it (which wasnt, originally, played legaly: it was posted to s-d).
The entity responsible for recognizing a Go Move is whoever plays the next stone. This was Phil, who played legally and recognized bd's move even though it was sent to s-d. Under r16, then, bd's move did indeed happen as intended. 

--
Wonko
"Tradition is what you resort to when you don't have the time or the money to do it right." 
     -Kurt Herbert Alder

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss