Re: [spoon-discuss] refresh props?

[athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 04:46:21PM -0400, Phil Ulrich wrote:
> Point the first: -nothing- is better than Pascal, except sex.

No, not THAT Pascal - and I didn't think his wager was so great.

> Point the second: if we're going to start one Gam, we need a second 
> one, so as to refer to C Nomic as "a set of Gams."

Let's put them in an array, like: 
Gam C_Nomic[2];

Then we can speak of "an array of Gams".

> As for your refresh proposal idea, yes, sounds doable. Now just do it.

Well, it requires a working ruleset. I'll have to modify Teucer's.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss