Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: CFI assignments

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:05:18 -0500, Araltaln <smgafkjen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> SkArcher wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:39:19 -0400 (EDT), Zarpint 
> > <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Araltaln wrote:
> > >
> > > > First, I'm going to name the Administrator as the defendant for my
> > > > currently-unnumbered CFI (I'll refer to it as -1, for argument's sake,
> > > > but it needs a real number); Zarpint, I believe, currently has the
> > > > highest score and thus gets to randomly assign a Judge.
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'll name the Administrator the defendant for -2 as well, giving 
> > > > Zarpint
> > > > more to do.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm honored that you quoted me. With a roll of my dice, I randomly 
> > > assign
> > > -1 to Teucer and -2 to SkArcher.
> >
> >
> > I point out that I am still officially Hiding under a Rock/On Leave as 
> > of the message from Zarpint. This doesn't change anything, since Rule 
> > 127 doesn't prevent players who are hiding under a rock/On leave from 
> > gaining CFIs, it only specifies what happens when they become On leave 
> > while having a pending CFI
> >
> > Someone should probably patch that hole.
>
> There's no hole, come to think of it; Rule 205/7 (Leaves of Absence) 
> states "A player who is On Leave cannot be selected by any process which 
> randomly selects a player," so Zarpint can't have randomly selected 
> SkArcher.

So it does. Good. Now Zarpint can select again, although this time I am an 
eligible candidate.

--
 SkArcher
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss