Re: [spoon-discuss] Chess

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Glotmorf wrote:

> If it's in violation of the terms of the offer, it's not a
> legal action.

I'm not sure if that's true... the way it's currently phrased, an Offer 
is a set of agreed upon gifts and actions; there's no provision for 
inactions. So arguably, the Offer can require you to give me your proxy 
or to use a computer to get moves, but it cannot require you *not* to 
take back the proxy or not to use a move-calculator.

Of course, now that I've pointed it out, there's no cleverness involved 
in exploiting it, so hopefully nobody will.

--
Wonko
Award Wonko a Win.
-----[[BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK]}-----
Version: 3.1
GU/O d-(++)(?) s+:+ a--->+++ C++>++++>$ UB+>++++ P--@ L+>+++ E>++ 
W++(+++) N+{((++]]}}) o?>++++ K? w------- O? M++ V- PS@ PE-@ Y-- PGP- 
t+ 5 X R+ tv--@ b+++@ DI++++ D G++ e*>++++ !h r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss