Re: [spoon-discuss] Chess

["Glotmorf" <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21 Jan 2004 at 10:53, Daniel Lepage wrote:

> 
> On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Glotmorf wrote:
> 
> > If it's in violation of the terms of the offer, it's not a
> > legal action.
> >
> > And of course it's distinguishable from a legal action.
> > Whoever violates the offer can distinguish it.  The magic
> > question isn't legality.  The magic question is verification.
> >
> > BTW, Wonko, what's your US rating?
> 
> I'm not a member of any major chess organization; perhaps rather than 
> saying "A game of FIDE chess" I should say "A game of chess under the 
> standard FIDE rules".
> 
> As for using software, I agree that it's not enforceable; I hope that 
> whoever accepts the Offer will informally agree not to do so.

Sure, what the hell.  Is anyone interested in seeing the game 
in progress?  It'd be no spammier than the bulk of what 
appears on the channels.

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a blog study in Social Technology.
http://ix.1sound.com/ivoryminitower

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss