Re: [spoon-discuss] so do we have a game or not?

["Glotmorf" <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16 Jan 2004 at 21:08, Baron von Skippy wrote:

> >> We do have a game, or don't, depending on what Dave says next.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, SkArcher wrote:
> >>
> >>> if not I have some suggestions
> >>
> >> Hypothetical question: What would the initial ruleset look like if it had
> >> been written entirely by Uin?
> >>
> >
> >having never played alongside uin, i have no idea. what was his major 
> >bugbear on how the rules should work again?
> >
> -Well, we're talking about someone who perpetually both wanted Rule 10 repealed and was declaring a SOE... I think the ruleset would probably say something along the lines of "Any player may do anything they want, as long as it is stupid," or whatever that line was.-

Didn't e sort of want to nuke all rules, if e could get away 
with it?  I believe e also wanted to introduce a player class 
called "Uninterested" or "Uninvolved" or something, so that a 
player could, if e so desired, be exempt from just about 
everything other than proposing, voting and judging.

In a Unix world, e would want to twiddle the bits.  With an 
icepick.

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a blog study in Social Technology.
http://ix.1sound.com/ivoryminitower

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss