Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Citizen, you have committed an error.

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 03 December 2003 09:27 pm, bd wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2003 09:09 pm, SkArcher wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 20:48:42 -0500, bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Iain and SkArcher's moves came in the wrong order, rendering them and
> > > Wonko's
> > > moves invalid. This is confirmed by all Received: headers.
> >
> > you are incorrect. I did not send my message until I had recieved Iains,
> > as per our agreement.
> >
> > The timestamps may be wrong, but the order sent is very definite
>
> Even if that's the case, Iain's is still invalid. He stated:
> I place a stone at  E7.
>
> However, he placed it at F7:
> 7 . . . R I T V . . . . . . 7
> 6 . . . . . I W W . R W . . 6
> 5 V R V . I B . W . V . . . 5
> 4 . . . R T T W W W V . . . 4
> 3 . . . R G W R W V V . . . 3
> 2 . . . . R R G V T . . . . 2
> 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
>   A B C D E F G H I J K L M
>
> This is probably due to the misalignment of the top column labels. In any
> case, his move fails, and if your takes into account his (which it does),
> yours also fails. So, actually, my corrections are incorrect, and the first
> "Citizen, ..." message I sent was correct.
 
Ignore this. I somehow mis-saw the board. Never mind.

But, in a case of disputed times such as this, which received: header takes 
precedence?

- -- 
bd
Your code should be more efficient!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/zpwG+hz2VlChukwRAqHXAKC16OtMjVkQpJP0f9I0oySLGOFJ3gCeO8Em
gusMQ606U6Vive/oBdXABTU=
=oMg1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss