Daniel Lepage on 23 Oct 2003 04:08:58 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 51 RESULTS |
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 03:12 PM, SkArcher wrote:
It's another of those ambiguous bracket situations isn't it?at a cost of (three style points per word of text) plus five score points.vs.at a cost of three style points per (word of text plus five score points).now, is there any way of gramatically arranging brackets to imply that Wonkoshould lose 5 score points per word of text?
Nope, because I explicitly stated that the action I was taking was to create a T-Shirt by spending some Style and no points; even under the logical interpretation of the rule, I haven't actually *done* anything, since the action I tried to take was illegal.
But it least it got somebody to *say* something. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss