[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 47 BALLOT

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 03:11  AM, David E. Smith wrote:

> I recognize p1655/0, which came in just in time for the ballot...
>
> The following measures are on the ballot for nweek 47:
>
> Proposal 1625/1: More is less (bd)
Yes.

> Proposal 1627/0: Less (Rob)
Yes. (I'd prefer bd's version to the current version, but I'd prefer no 
version most of all)

> Proposal 1628/0: There's a hole (SkArcher)
Yes.

> Proposal 1629/0: Quote Prop by Anything McGee (Anything McGee)
Yes.

> Proposal 1630/0: Enough Already! (Wonko)
Yes.

> Proposal 1631/0: A Cheat By Any Other Name (The Administrator)
Yes.

> Proposal 1640/1: Justice and Freedom of Speech (Anything McGee)
Shelve. Some of the language needs to be tightened (referred to the 
Upper House doesn't imply any sort of judgment or decision making; nor 
does it specify how the Upper House is to decide)

> Proposal 1641/3: Housekeeping (Anything McGee)
Shelve. Standard Delimiters don't belong with proposals.

> Proposal 1642/0: Players (Baron von Skippy)
No. This still doesn't account for the extant rule, and the second 
paragraph needs some tweaking to avoid giving anyone the power to 
forfeit anyone else.

> Proposal 1643/0: Scams (Baron von Skippy)
No. The current system works better, I think.

> Proposal 1644/0: Subgame Fora (SkArcher)
No.

> Proposal 1645/0: The One Thing They Really Couldn't Stand (Wonko)
Yes.

> Proposal 1646/0: Bandwidth Changes (Anything McGee)
No. I think we have enough already.

> Proposal 1647/0: Contrary and Unanimous Votes (Anything McGee)
Yes. Good to have something change about that.

> Proposal 1648/0: Quote prop by The Pusher Robot (The Pusher Robot)
Abstain.

> Proposal 1649/0: Players redefined (Baron von Skippy)
Yes.

> Proposal 1651/0: Dante's Inferno, Canto XXXIV (Baron von Skippy)
Shelve. I'd prefer it on a T-Shirt.

> Proposal 1652/0: A clean, rules-friendly way of saying ... (Wonko)
Yes.

> Proposal 1653/0: My Clock, It Keeps Getting Stuck (The Administrator)
Yes.

> Proposal 1654/0: The Cactus Jack Memorial Prize (The Administrator)
Yes.

> Proposal 1655/0: Do What I Say, Not What I Diagram (Glotmorf)
No. The point of that clause is to ensure that the game really is 
self-tracking; if stated moves take precedence, I can put any old 
gibberish in for the board, and still make moves.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss