[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Checkpointly Recognizer...

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 10:44  AM, David E. Smith wrote:

> ... hm, that name just doesn't quite have the same ZING ~! as the 
> original.

We could call it "King Steve's Kick Ass Recognizer".

> There's a possible loophole in the way Checkpoints work (or, rather, a
> bug?) I'm caught up on Recognizing stuff right now, so far as I know. 
> So,
> I'm leaving town for today and most of tomorrow. However, if anyone 
> does
> anything that I'm required to recognize between now and about 7pm my 
> time
> (which is the next nine hours and change), the clock will automatically
> stop when nday 4 arrives (at about 7pm).
>
> Maybe someone should find a clean, rules-friendly way of saying "if
> something has gone unrec'd for longer than 24 hours or so at the end 
> of a
> Checking Period, then the clock shuts Off 'til Dave gets caught up, 
> which
> will take a while given the fact that Microsoft keeps breaking the
> Internet".

I propose:
{{
__A clean, rules-friendly way of saying "if something has gone unrec'd 
for longer than 24 hours or so at the end of a Checking Period, then 
the clock shuts Off 'til Dave gets caught up, which will take a while 
given the fact that Microsoft keeps breaking the Internet"__

Amend r1586 by replacing the last sentence with "If, at the end of a 
checking period, legal actions taken more than 24 hours before the end 
of the checking period have not been officially recognized, the Clock 
is turned off until they are."
}}

> If Christine knew who any of you people are, she'd probably say Hi.

Hi!

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss