Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] More on scams

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

24/07/2003 14:47:15, Iain Scott <iop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>At 13:42 24/07/03, you wrote:
>
>
>>On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 12:08  AM, Baron von Skippy wrote:
>>
>>>>>I alter the proposal __Scams__ to read:
>>>>>
>>>>>{{
>>>>>__Scams_
>>I don't see why we should bother setting up an official system of 
>>determining these things when A) the unofficial system works fine, and B) 
>>we can't come up with a way to make the official version work as well.
>
>Hear, hear.
>
>cheers
>Iain

I think that defining the system of rewards and titles is fine, but the actual definition of a scam should be 'when the players agree that a scam has been 
commited'

SkArcher 


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss