Re: [spoon-discuss] "effects related to proposal failure"

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 12:25  PM, SkArcher wrote:

> Since when am I in the minority. The majority of the players seem to 
> be in on the failure scam.

AFAICT, you're the only one who firmly believes that this is true; a 
few people are unsure (or don't have time to read the relevant rules 
and are waiting for others to figure it out for them), and a bunch of 
people, myself included, are doing random things just in case the CFI's 
go the wrong way, so that we'll profit from it if for some strange 
reason it goes through, but we don't really expect it to go through.

Your scam depends on the assumption that if you define an object (in 
this case, an effect) within the text of a proposal, then that object 
exists regardless of the passage or failue of that proposal. I see no 
reason to assume that this is the case; and in fact many reasons to 
assume that it is not.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss