Re: [spoon-discuss] Ow.

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/30/03 at 12:58 PM Daniel Lepage wrote:

>Curiously enough, if you had put another rule in your fake prop, it
>would have been legal under the multiple rules clause. But if it's a
>single rule, you have to have the same name on the prop and the rule.
>Kinda funny how that works.

Sorry, guy, it doesn't quite say that.  It says that "The Proposal is given the same title as the Rule."  That doesn't mean it has to start out that way.  It means if it's recognized as to "propose a rule" its title needs to be changed to that of the rule inside.  But the original, overwritten title doesn't make the proposal illegal.

I guess in that instance the proposal's initial title is some of that meaningless delimited text you were talking about.

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a blog study in Social Technology.
http://ix.1sound.com/ivoryminitower

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss