Daniel Lepage on 30 Jun 2003 17:12:02 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 44 BALLOT



On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 01:08  PM, SkArcher wrote:

30/06/2003 17:59:06, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Proposal 1574/0: Duties (SkArcher)
Yes, but I hope to get rid of the clause requiring all Duties to be in
that rule. That's what keywords are for.

I did send a reply about this, but I think it got chewed up by my server

The wording of the rule only requires the duties to be listed there - it does not say that the duties must have their entire clauses and effects there, just that a list of them must be kept there. The only reason the Duty Duty is fully explained is that - well, where else is it going to go?

I am aware that keywords are theoretically for this, but frankly i find that the keywords system isn't greatly implemented and some rules are missing
essential keywords

We have a Ministry of Keywords for this, which I intend to run for as soon as I return from vacation (leaving tomorrow, back on saturday). I haven't done much with keywords yet because I don't want to bother with rules that are about to be repealed anyway.; I'm waiting to see what's left, and I'll be happy to rekey all the survivors.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss