Re: [spoon-discuss] Ahem...

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

28/06/2003 11:06:16, "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 6/28/03 at 10:46 AM SkArcher wrote:
>
>>28/06/2003 09:39:20, Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>You know, everyone seems bent on gutting the ruleset so we can start over
>>>(more or less)... anyone think maybe it's time for C Nomic? Would that be
>>>easier, or is there enough that we want to keep to justify trying to
>>>separate it from the cruft?
>>
>>Unless it is absolutely necessary (as in, we tie the game into such a knot
>>that we cannot extricate
>>ourselves) I'd prefer not to scrap what we have got
>>
>>And anyway, wasn't it said somewhere that it was to be D Nomic, to avoid
>>all the lame programming
>>jokes?
>
>No can do.  If there's gonna be lame programming, I reserve the right to make a joke about it.
>
>						Glotmorf
>

I bow to your superior knowledge of Programming Lames

SkArcher 


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss