bd on 5 Jun 2003 20:49:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 42 BALLOT |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 05 June 2003 12:52 am, Mark Karasek wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 22:29:57 -0400, Craig <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>> >> >>>>> ThisProp is not a real word; the rest looks real enough to > >>>>>> > >>>>>> me... :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>> -I Kick Wonko in the Ass for Unbridled Hostility (TM) to my > >>>>>> > >>>>>> sanity.- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>>> I think we should add "performing an action listed on the > >>>>>> > >>>>>> LOGAS" to > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>>> the LOGAS. > >>>>>> >> >>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>> -So that you can get two kicks for the price of one? I > >>>>>> > >>>>>> like.- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>> Or better yet, let's add "being kicked in the ass" to the > >>>>>> > >>>>>> LOGAS. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >> -Or better better yet, make Kicking someone an act of > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unbridled > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >> Hostility. It just goes around and around and around...- > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> >I'd rather kick somebody an infinite number of times than have > >>>>>> > >>>>>> two > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >people kick each other an infinite number of times; maybe that's > >>>>>> > >>>>>> just > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >me. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >>It's audience vs. participation. When all you're doing is > >>>>>> > >>>>>> watching, > >>>>>> it > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>gets old after the first hundred thousand times. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> Glotmorf > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> >-Exactly. I'm just spreading the fun around. Besides, if you kick > >>>>>> > >>>>>> someone > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >ten thousand times, I'll call you for spamming, kick you ten > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thousand > >>>>>> times, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >get called by someone else... my way limits the kicks per message > >>>>>> > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> thus > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >the file size of the crap in our inboxes, if not the number of > >>>>>> > >>>>>> messages.- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No. I can set my Automation Script to kick anyone who kicks me. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Which cuts down even farther on the messages...- > >>>> > >>>> You know, pretty soon this game is going to be entirely played by > >>>> automation scripts and we can do away with the fora altogether. > >>> > >>> I dunno about you, but I can't come up with an AS that will consider a > >>> proposal and figure out how it ought to vote. Or one that submits > >>> decent > >>> props. So unless you mean that we're going to come up with scripts that > >>> pass > >>> the Turing test... > >> > >> Eh, shouldn't be too hard. I'd show you one, but then I'd get my ass > >> Kicked > >> for using pseudocode. ;-) > > > > I hereby call TPR's bluff. Send it to me off-list at ragnarok at pobox > > dot > > com. > > > > -Teucer > > You know, I would, but Baron von Skippy's new automation script is much > more elegant than my pseudocode one, so see his for an example. Post it to -discuss - the LOGAS dosen't apply here. - -- bd Perfection is acheived only on the point of collapse. - - C. N. Parkinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+36yWx533NjVSos4RAvSfAKC52r+jYYbkgqF0LkE+Q+zY8myZAQCgkppE a+zhNYLW/s5PoqJV2JzpHCY= =nwyW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss