Re: [spoon-discuss] Keywords

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

26/05/2003 23:04:06, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Say, looking at the ruleset, I notice that most of the rules seem to be 
>uncategorized in terms of keywords. Also, there are some seemingly 
>random inconsistencies... like that 17 rules have the keyword "gnome"; 
>but for some reason there's one other with kw "gnomes".
>
>It also occurred to me that it might be helpful to assign each rule a 
>'primary keyword'; thus, by looking at the entire ruleset sorted by 
>primary keyword would show each rule exactly once, sorted by what 
>they're most relevant to.
>
>Any thoughts about any of this?
>
>-- 
>Wonko

Cleaning up the Keywords (and assigning keywords to some of the uncategorised rules) would be a lot of work, but 
very useful. A 'sort by primary keyword' option is interesting, but what you consider to be the primary keyword 
isn't guaranteed to be the same as mine.

What would be interesting would be a system where you could display all the rules which are related to a certain 
rule - displaying all the rules which have a reference to 'The Grid' or in some way rely on rule 301 for their 
operation, for example



SkArcher

I'm really tired of people equating the Matrix with christianity. I think it's a disservice to the movie to 
compare it with a thousand pages of confused hallucinogenic gibberish. - Sstory, in a post on slashdot


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss