Re: [spoon-discuss] Fwd: State of the Nomic (Nomicron)

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 01 May 2003 06:27 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 06:19  PM, bd wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 01 May 2003 05:44 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 09:08  PM, bd wrote:
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> On Wednesday 30 April 2003 09:05 pm, Baron von Skippy wrote:
> >>>>>>> My fellow players, I urge you all to abstain from responding to
> >>>>>>> BvS'
> >>>>>>> shameless attacks.  They do nothing to promote the intellectual
> >>>>>>> integrity of Nomicron.  With any luck, we will soon no longer be
> >>>>>>> subject to his behavior.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Ha. We shall see. Yes, indeed. We shall see.-
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stop it. Now they're scaring me and you're scaring me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To those inclined to take things on other mailing lists out of
> >>>>> context,
> >>>>> the above was a joke, as I assume was what BvS said. To those who
> >>>>> do
> >>>>> not
> >>>>> need such things pointed out to them and who think humor is better
> >>>>> without little
> >>>>> sarcasm markers, take it up with quarksbar9.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Hmm, I sort of meant that as a joke. There's no way for, say, B
> >>>> Nomic to
> >>>> mass-join and overthrow the impeachment, so I'm looking into ways to
> >>>> get
> >>>> around it by rejoining or something under a different alias. The
> >>>> only
> >>>> problem is that if I do so, I'll have to scream in pain from biting
> >>>> my
> >>>> tongue enough not to get re-impeached...-
> >>>>
> >>>> -By the way, if someone could find a way to remove this pragraph and
> >>>> let
> >>>> Nomicron see the rest of this message, that would be great.-
> >>>
> >>> BvS, please stop associating this with B Nomic. We don't need your
> >>> vendetta
> >>> interfering with politics.
> >>> - --
> >>> bd
> >>> This message was written with vi!  (not that anyone in the world
> >>> cares)
> >>>         -- seen on an old message from an anon.penet.fi address
> >>
> >> Why would anyone use vi for email?
> >
> > If it's set as your EDITOR and you use mutt...
>
> Why would anyone use vi as their EDITOR? Emacs is practically the same
> thing, except with all the rest of your applications strapped on for
> the ride.
>
> Personally, I do all my serious editing in Bbedit, but maybe that's
> just me.

Personally, I use emacs for any 'long' session of editing, and nano for 
quickie changes. And KMail for mailing.

- -- 
bd
Nudists are people who wear one-button suits.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+sZ/0x533NjVSos4RAihiAKDDV8WsunUGpVqgVxSpGGnmEczHDgCgsboQ
i0dEqdcncfIpRpOA9bfDGcQ=
=+2IK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss