Re: [spoon-discuss] Pretty. What do we blow up first?

["Orc In A Spacesuit" <orcinaspacesuit@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: "Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> I think I've come across an interesting back door in various Nomics that 
> would allow the utter destruction or minor screwing with of the rulesets of 
> other Nomics, although that's up for debate.

I'd rather not have the first thing B Nomic does with a bunch of other 
nomics be the destruction or screwage of said nomic.  Not the best foot to 
step out on, in my mind.  I'd rather have something more social or 
productive before we get into that stuff.

On another note, I just thought of another way to have inter-nomic 
relations: have events in one nomic cause events in another.  For example, a 
rule in another nomic could read as follows:
{{
If the B Nomic player Baron von Skippy is Awarded a Win in B Nomic, each 
player in this game recieves one (some item).
If the B Nomic player uin is Awarded a Win in B Nomic, then for each Motion 
to Repeal a Rule, an additional vote is cast for it in the affirmative.
If the B Nomic player Wonko is Awarded a Win in B Nomic, each player in this 
game recieves 100 points.

(etc)
}}

And vica versa.  And it wouldn't necessarily have to be based on wins or 
players; perhaps every time a gremlin goes into hiding here, it causes some 
effect in another game (like, when they're not here, they're somewhere else, 
or something).

I encourage our ambassador to look into this.

Orc in a Spacesuit

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss