Wonko on 12 Dec 2002 22:47:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 28 BALLOT |
Quoth Rob Speer, > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:03:34PM -0600, David E. Smith wrote: >> Proposal 1239/1: Hey, Artifacts! (Wonko) > > NO [[I would vote SHELVE because of the "There exists" part, but even > if it were fixed this rule sounds like the kind we're trying to get rid > of - it creates arbitrary objects that probably no one will ever use.]] I'm not creating arbitrary objects; I'm redefining extant ones to be easier to work with. In fact, this prop only adds three lines to the ruleset, while simultaneously shortening the Shield and Sledge significantly. >> Proposal 1241/1: Standard Abuses (Wonko) > SHELVE [[The "three units away" part, and why create another useless > attribute?]] Which useless attribute would that be? This prop also doesn't add much, and shortens a lot of existing stuff. The idea was that if we were going to have a number of objects with identical functions, we might as well make it a bunch of objects using the same function, to cut down on overhead. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss