bd on 4 Dec 2002 17:11:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] R1219 change |
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 11:29 am, Rob Speer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:10:42AM -0500, Glotmorf wrote: > > This rule takes precedence over all other rules. > > > > If the implementation of a proposal would result in a rule other than > > this one having a higher chutzpah than this rule, this rule's chutzpah is > > adjusted just prior to implementation of that proposal to be one higher > > than the targeted rule's new chutzpah. > > > > Any change to the chutzpah of a rule other than this one must be to an > > explicitly stated numerical value. > > I'm going to fix my proposal accordingly. This is fun. > > I modify my proposal "Step The Hell Down Already" to be: > {{ > 1. Append to Rule 1248 [[because it's numbered higher]], this paragraph: > "Rule 1219 may be repealed by a proposal entitled 'Step The Hell Down > Already'. This rule takes precedence over Rule 1219." Dosen't work. The chutzpah is the overriding factor here, not the rule ID. The explicit precedences cancel. > 2. Repeal Rule 1219. > 3. Remove the last paragraph of Rule 1248. > }} > > [[Again, the blind faith in Chutzpah. But moreover, this is Nomic, where > as long as the game is still playable no rule is immutable. If you > intend to fix your rule so that this doesn't work, I suggest you do it > hypothetically on spoon-discuss so I can respond with the hypothetical > change to the proposal.]] -- bd "I'm gonna be a famous hero just like Neil Armstrong and those other brave guys no one ever heard of." -Fry _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss