Glotmorf on 3 Dec 2002 04:05:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Daily Recognizer (Sunday evening) |
On 12/2/02 at 8:40 PM Wonko wrote: >Quoth David E. Smith, > >> CFIs: >> Glotmorf's "p1234 is illegal" CFI is 1242, assigned to Capsaicin. >> Glotmorf's "p1237 is illegal" CFI is 1243, assigned to Wonko. > >Uh... TRUE... Trivially, obviously TRUE. Of course implementing a proposal >that's explicitly forbidden is illegal. So is implementing a failed >proposal. Why wouldn't it be? The big question is, if implementing it is illegal, why is it even proposable? >> Under the (old) Garbage Collection rule, Squire of Dimness is removed >from >> the Roster. > >Actually, e isn't. A side effect I've noticed of my Proxy rewrite: >"When this happens, the player whose proxy is held is considered to have >cast the vote, instead of the proxy-holder." Yes, but if Squire of Dimness is on Forced Leave, doesn't that mean e has to explicitly say e's no longer On Leave before x number of nweeks pass with em on Forced Leave? Glotmorf ----- The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog http://ix1.1sound.com/ivoryminitower _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss