[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Ramroding the CFI's

["Orc In A Spacesuit" <orcinaspacesuit@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

First, I am completly in favor of rolling back the clock, if it means the 
nonsense ends.  And this will be my last email for a while.

However, I am still going to respond to something else Glotmorf said:

> From: "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> The CFIs weren't recognized correctly. The serial numbers don't correspond 
> to the serial number rule, which requires them to be sequentially after 
> whatever the last thing was that was created.

I quote:
"Proposals, Rules and other objects requiring serial numbers, unless 
specified by the entities that create them, are assigned unique 
identification numbers that consist of the smallest integer that is larger 
than the largest identification number in use at the time of the object's 
creation. Identification numbers for Calls for Judgment cannot be specified 
by the Players creating them."

I specify that my CFI's are not assigned unique identification numbers that 
consist of the smallest integer that is larger than the largest 
identification number in use at the time of their creation.
Regarding the restriction on "Calls for Judgement", all it restricts is that 
I cannot specify the identification numbers.  However, I can just say they 
don't get any at all.
Oh, and are CFI's still Calls For Judgement at all?  I think not, under the 
current rules.

> Since they haven't been recognized correctly, they haven't been recognized. 
>  I hereby delete them before they are.

They already were recognized.  And judged.  Therefore, the game is just fine 
now.

Respectfully,
Orc In A Spacesuit

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss