Baron von Skippy on 20 Oct 2002 02:14:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] finally... |
-You know, there's no Rule 302. Or 303, or 304... 353. What if 301 (and maybe 256 and 441 at some point) was broken into smaller, more manageable chunks? It would effectively be the same as the current system; same words, same precedents, etc., but it would be easier to look at each section of the rule. Would that help, Dave?-I'm trying to work on the voting results as best I can. The Web server is up, I think, but it's annoying to have to submit (and occasionally re-submit) pages with gigantic massive forms over a dialup link. (Every time someone revises Rule 301, I grow another grey hair.) ...dave[[BvS]]I'll set up the uber like that. This particular edit won't be that much of a problem. But the numbering? No. There were rules/proposals with those numbers, and while we can get those numbers for anything, I'd rather not.Orc In A Spacesuit is glad things are back together
-Point.- [[BvS]] _________________________________________________________________Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss