Glotmorf on 27 Sep 2002 14:06:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Votes, nweek 23 |
On 9/27/02 at 1:47 AM Rob Speer wrote: >Prop___ Vote___________ Comments______________________________ >1001 NO Um... sounds like yet another Society designed > to give certain people money. No. >1002 YES Being a pain in the ass results in a pain in the > ass. Hammurabi would be proud. Missed 1003. >1004 YES You voted no on WBE, but yes on a prop that makes profit for WBE? >1006 NO Societies scare me. Nested ones scare me more. "If you scare them..." "They'll think." "And if they think?" "They'll become even more scared." -- from "The Seventh Seal" >1013 NO Since A Nomic, the words "The Bank" give me the > shivers. Too late. We've already got a Bank. >1023 NO How is it a "less is more" if it doesn't > actually get shorter? Fewer rules. Things consolidated into fewer places. >1024 NO What does that accomplish? Right now r946 has subsections A, B, C and G. It cleans up the subsections, and also cleans up the language of the current subsection G. >1026 YES Though the restriction on players won't be very > restrictive if someone, say, makes a Gremlin out > of papier-mache. E'd have to make sentience out of papier-mache too. >1033 YES Missed 1034. >1035 YES Missed 1051 and 1052. >1057 NO I'd prefer if stories usually had something to > do with the proposal, or were separated from > proposals entirely. It was supposed to help set up a framework for things like the dimship-related stories, since it looks like those are turning collaborative, but, yes, I admit I thought it'd be neat to have a general-purpose storybuilding mechanism too. Had writing on the brain for a few days now. >-- >Rob Speer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss