| Glotmorf on 26 Sep 2002 03:06:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Well, damn, here's athought... |
On 9/25/02 at 9:07 PM Baron von Skippy wrote: >> >> >>And because the proposal is a kneejerk reaction to a situation that >>the >> >> >>rule in question didn't actually cause, which means the rule will >get >> >> >>killed before it's even been given a chance to be useful. >> >> >-It should have died before it had a chance to get abused.- >> >> >> >>That could have been said about the original stock proposal. Didn't >>that >> >>pass damn near unanimously? >> > >> >-Don't remember. Maybe we should put stock away for a bit so the bugs >can >> >be >> >hammered out. Like DimShips, which I still think there's a future for.- >> >>That would involve a non-amputation approach to putting something away. >>Just a sec... > >-Some sort of Inactive Rule setting?- Should be in the ballot now. Sort of the opposite of the idea someone had about putting proposals up for review...it's taking rules down for review. Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss