Glotmorf glotmorf on Sat, 31 Aug 2002 01:48:35 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[BNomic-Public] Miniplayers |
On 8/30/02 at 8:07 PM Wonko wrote: >I had an idea: What if we allowed people to join the game not as full >players, but as 'miniplayers' - people who could only do things like run >around on the Grid, buy stocks, etc. So people who like the idea of the >Grid >could do the Grid thing, but they wouldn't have to worry about making >proposals or voting on things. For them, the Grid IS the game. For us,= they >provide a way of making the Grid more interesting. Also, if they can use >the >Stock Market, then they can provide that randomness we were talking about= - >if three dozen people are buying and selling stock, no single player can >exert too much influence, but the prices can still be based on how well >they >sell. > > >Is this a good idea, or am I nuts? >I suppose those aren't mutually exclusive conditions, are they? You're not nuts, or at least not in this respect. uin had a similar idea= with...what did he call them? "Disinterested" players? People who didn't= participate in the grid, weren't subject to the sushi or gremlins or= anything like that, that only were involved in proposals, voting and= judging. I was against it at the time because it amounted to him= affecting the game but not being affected by it, which I found= objectionable. What you're suggesting is the crystallization of subsets of the game as= games in their own right, with a policy-making layer over top...sort of= like if the management of neopets.com was a nomic game. Interesting idea,= but wouldn't it take rather a lot of work to make the subgames something= people would want to play in their own right? At the moment, neither grid= football nor gremball are up to the standards of average pbm games... Glotmorf