Baron von Skippy baronvonskippy on Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:33:24 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule |
> >>>> {{ > >>>> __Mutations BAD! Krunk smash!__ > >>>> > >>>> Amend rule 33 to read as follows: > >>>> {{ > >>>> Each Rule has an attribute called Chutzpah, which is a positive > >> integer. In > >>>> the event of a conflict between two or more rules, if this rule is >one, > >> it > >>>> takes precedence. Otherwise, the rule with the highest Chutzpah takes > >>>> precedence. > >>>> > >>>> If two or more rules have equal Chutzpah, the rule with the lowest > >>>> identification number takes precedence. > >>>> > >>>> If at least one of the rules in conflict explicity says of itself >that > >> it > >>>> defers to another rule (or type of rule), then such provisions shall > >>>> supersede the Chutzpah method for determining precedence. > >>>> > >>>> If two or more rules claim to take precedence over each other or to > >> defer > >>>> to > >>>> one another, then the Chutzpah method again governs. > >>>> > >>>> Whenever one section of a rule conflicts with another section of the > >> same > >>>> rule, the section which appears later in the rule takes precedence >over > >> the > >>>> earlier section. > >>>> > >>>> This rule may not be repealed or amended. > >>>> }} > >>>> Create the following CFI: > >>>> {{ > >>>> Statement: Rule 33 may not be repealed, renumbered, or amended, EVER, > >> and > >>>> this > >>>> CFI cannot be overruled by other CFIs or by any other method. > >>>> }} > >>>> > >>>> Rule the preceding CFI TRUE. > >>>> Appeal the preceding CFI. > >>>> Rule the preceding CFI TRUE. > >>>> }} > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> bd > >>>> The above == my from field. Duh. > >>>> > >>> -Didn't I already deal with this? > >>> > >>> {{ > >>> __Bite me, Krunk__ > >>> > >>> Change Rule 33's Serial Number to 100. > >>> > >>> Repeal Rule 100. > >>> }} > >>> - > >>> > >> > >> No, bd added 'renumbered' to the CFI. > >> > >> Ya do it like this, using XXXX as the above CFI's number: > >> {{ > >> __Think again__ > >> > >> Change the gamestate to what it would have been had CFI XXXX been ruled > >> FALSE. > >> }} > >> > >> -- > >> Wonko > >> > > -Whups, must have missed that.- > > > > {{ > > __How abouts this'n?__ > > > > Change Rule 1's serial number to 33. > > }} > >Violation of whichever rule says that each object has a unique serial >number. > >Also, hell on the Database. > >-- >Wonko > -Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules the same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it. So it seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event of a conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 wins out over Rule 33.- [[BvS]] _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx