Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Alterations (wow, that was fast...)

["Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > > > -Okay, I've got it now, but this is gonna cause a discrepancy with 
> Rule
> > >10,
> > > > but I think it'll be okay because, even though Rule 10 claims to 
> take
> > > > precedence, this proposal will have a higher Chutzpah... yeah, it'll
> > >work
> > > > fine, according to the bulleted list in Rule 33. Good. Fine. 
> Whatever.
> > >I'm
> > > > sure you'll find a way out of this one...-
> > > >
> > > >                                                    -BvS-
> > >
> > >Even with a higher Chutzpah, you'll need a 2/3 majority to pass your
> > >proposal, according to Rule 10...
> > >
> > >Athena
> >
> > -Ah, but I don't, because I'm not attempting to modify Rule 10, I'm
> > attempting to declare it null as applies to IRs. And I'm not breaking 
> any
> > other parts of Rule 10, either. Muahaha.-
> >
> >                                                    -BvS-
>
> Rule 33: Chutzpah defers to statements in the rule saying a rule defers to
> other rules.
>
> Rule 10 says that it takes precedence over all other rules, so in order to
> let the fight between your rule and r10 be decided by Chutzpah rather than
> that statement, you need an explicit statement saying in your rule saying
> it takes precedence over Rule 10, and you need a higher Chutzpah.
>
> Athena
-I'd have to hear a second opinion on this one, since neither rule defers to 
the other, Rule 10 declares precedence, and there's nothing there about 
Chutzpah taking a back seat to precedence, and my prop already has a higher 
Chutzpah (13 to 10).-

                                                  -BvS-


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss