Glotmorf on 19 Jul 2002 05:24:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Daily Recognizer (Thursday evening) |
On 7/19/02 at 1:20 AM Baron von Skippy wrote: >> >> >"Chits of Proposal" is 860/2. >> >> >"Right to Privacy" is 882/3. >> >> >"An Ode to the Gods of Planar Geometry" is 873/3. >> >> > >> >> >Dan's revision to "Who said games were supposed to be easy?" was >late, >> >>and >> >> >thus cannot be legally recognized. >> >> > >> >> >Glotmorf's CFI on whether UIN is a player is 887, assigned to >>Slumbering >> >> >Giant 1. (I contend that e is an active player, only one who isn't >>being >> >> >played by eir original player. I expect a quick judgment and equally >> >>quick >> >> >appeal, so this can be settled in a group manner.) >> >> >> >>How can there be a quick judgment on this? We haven't heard a peep out >> >of >> >>uin since May, and Wonko's not empowered to judge in eir name. >> >> >> >> Glotmorf >> > >> >-Fine, so uin will go on the LOMJ (first member of that in a long >> >time...), >> >and Dave'll give it to whoever agrees with him. Gotta love this game...- >> >>At which point we have a minor paradox if the CFI is judged true, since >if >>uin isn't a player e shouldn't have gone onto the LMJ and a replacement >>judge shouldn't have been chosen. That, on top of having to back the >votes >>out...:) >> >> Glotmorf > >-Paradox? Hardly. It'll just mean that making him a judge in the first >place >wasn't legal, so he'll be off the list and out of the game. And I'll >personally keep track of any measures the outcome of which would have been >affected by the lack of his vote, okay?- Hmm...Minister of the Ballot? Though that'd involve keeping track of proposals and revisions too... Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss