Glotmorf on 19 Jul 2002 05:24:02 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Daily Recognizer (Thursday evening)


On 7/19/02 at 1:20 AM Baron von Skippy wrote:

>> >> >"Chits of Proposal" is 860/2.
>> >> >"Right to Privacy" is 882/3.
>> >> >"An Ode to the Gods of Planar Geometry" is 873/3.
>> >> >
>> >> >Dan's revision to "Who said games were supposed to be easy?" was
>late,
>> >>and
>> >> >thus cannot be legally recognized.
>> >> >
>> >> >Glotmorf's CFI on whether UIN is a player is 887, assigned to
>>Slumbering
>> >> >Giant 1. (I contend that e is an active player, only one who isn't
>>being
>> >> >played by eir original player. I expect a quick judgment and equally
>> >>quick
>> >> >appeal, so this can be settled in a group manner.)
>> >>
>> >>How can there be a quick judgment on this?  We haven't heard a peep out
>> >of
>> >>uin since May, and Wonko's not empowered to judge in eir name.
>> >>
>> >>						Glotmorf
>> >
>> >-Fine, so uin will go on the LOMJ (first member of that in a long
>> >time...),
>> >and Dave'll give it to whoever agrees with him. Gotta love this game...-
>>
>>At which point we have a minor paradox if the CFI is judged true, since
>if
>>uin isn't a player e shouldn't have gone onto the LMJ and a replacement
>>judge shouldn't have been chosen.  That, on top of having to back the
>votes
>>out...:)
>>
>>						Glotmorf
>
>-Paradox? Hardly. It'll just mean that making him a judge in the first
>place
>wasn't legal, so he'll be off the list and out of the game. And I'll
>personally keep track of any measures the outcome of which would have been
>affected by the lack of his vote, okay?-

Hmm...Minister of the Ballot?  Though that'd involve keeping track of proposals and revisions too...

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss