Glotmorf on 17 Jul 2002 18:40:08 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] proposal |
On 7/17/02 at 2:02 PM Wonko the Sane wrote: >>{{ >>__Who said games were supposed to be easy?__ >> >>delete ",and comments" from the last paragraph of rule 154, subsection >>B.6. >> >>append to same rule and subsection the following >> >>{{ >> >>These restrictions also apply to any non-public forum communication with >>players on the subject of this game or nomic games in general. A player >>violating this restriction in a non-retractable way [[for example where >>the transgression was during the exchange of information not some action >>that can be disallowed]] shall have eir score reduced by the admin 10 >>points per email message, conversation, or simmilar amount of information >>up to a maximum of 50 points per nday and 100 points per nweek. A >>player's score shall not be reduced to fewer than zero points in this way. >>There shall be no penalty if the transgression is not noticed by or >>brought to the attention of the administrator within an nweek of having >>been commited. >>}} >>}} > > >Quite frankly, I don't like all these restrictions on public forum >messages, >because I'm not convinced that they work. If a rule says "No player may >post >a message to a public forum unless that message contains the word 'foo' at >least twice", and I post a message that only has one 'foo', what happens >then? The rule says I can't post a message like that, but obviously, I >did. >If you like at the list of everything that's reached the public forum, the >one-foo message would most definitely be there. So in fact, the problem is >that the rule is wrong - it says I can't, when I can. Basically, you're >trying to regulate Real World actions with Nomic World rules. > >Now, if the rule said "the effects of postings that don't comply with this >rule are nullified", maybe that would work. Or perhaps "The author of any >message that fails to comply with these restrictions loses 10 points". But >not "no player may post a message that doesn't comply with these >restrictions", because that's not something the Game can control. Sure it is. If it's not legal to post in such a way, it can't possibly be a legal action worthy of being recognized by the Administrator. Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss