Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Unauthored Proposals

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Glotmorf,

> On 7/12/02 at 9:57 PM Wonko wrote:
> 
>> {{
>> __Enrique Proposes__
>> 
>> Create:
>> {{
>> __Unauthored Proposals__
>> 
>> Certain documents may be designated by the rules as Unauthored Proposals,
>> or
>> UPs. UPs are Proposals. When an UP is issued by any entity other than the
>> Scoring Gremlin, it is immediately destroyed, and the Scoring Gremlin
>> immediately makes an UP identical to the one destroyed.
>> }}
>> 
>> Amend rule 395 by removing the last sentence of the second-to-last
>> paragraph, and replacing the first sentence of said paragraph with
>> "Declarations of Respect/Disrespect are Unauthored Proposals."
>> 
>> Replace the first sentence of rule 627 with "A Vote of Non-Confidence is an
>> unauthored proposal."
>> 
>> 
>> [[Why? It's just easier.]]
>> }}
> 
> How about judgment props?  Rule 704.
> 

I thought about that, but don't we want to be able to amend judgment props?
It was a choice between leaving out jps, or writing a big complicated mess
to let us amend them even though they technically weren't ours... I left out
the jps. 

-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss