Re: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES

Rob Speer on 25 Jun 2002 16:05:04 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES
From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:04:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <200206251105.32276.bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206250207060.21841-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200206251105.32276.bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:05:32AM -0400, bd wrote:
> > Proposal 800/0: Why Should Players Fail to Have All the Fun? (M-Tek)
> NO [[ What, are you kidding? This is crazy! ]]

What's wrong with it? It doesn't change the part where the rule defers
to all other rules.
-- 
Rob Speer

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES
  - From: bd

References:
- [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES
  - From: bd

Prev by Date: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] No subjectiness
Next by Date: Re: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES
Previous by thread: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES
Next by thread: Re: [spoon-discuss] [Spoon-business] NWEEK 18 VOTES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread