Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh proposal

bd on 4 Jun 2002 23:32:49 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh proposal

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh proposal
From: bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:31:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <20020604233056.GA3937@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200206041924.12298.bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020604233056.GA3937@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.4.1

On Tuesday 04 June 2002 7:30 pm, Rob Speer wrote:
> This doesn't stop recognizing the Emergency (but mine didn't either),
> and leaves all the DimShips in existence.

1. The emergence is automatically ended as per r0, methinks.
2. What's wrong with dimships?

References:
- spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh proposal
  - From: Rob Speer

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh proposal
Next by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh Proposal
Previous by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh proposal
Next by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Refresh Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread