Glotmorf on 18 May 2002 03:24:48 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: ok dave... |
On 5/17/02 at 11:18 PM The Voice wrote: >>From: "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>Subject: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: ok dave... >>Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 23:12:30 -0400 >> >>On 5/17/02 at 11:11 PM The Voice wrote: >> >> >{{ __Time Freeze, my butt__ >> > >> >Amend rule 3 by changing the text, >> > >> >"If the Clock is Off, no player may take any game-related actions except >> >actions which the rules specifically say may be taken while The Clock is >> >Off." >> > >> >To the following: >> > >> >"If the Clock is Off, any game-related actions taken by players are >> >recorded >> >by the Administrator. They are then implemented/recognized in reverse >> >order >> >of eir recieving them once the Clock is On." >> > >> >}} >> > >> >Didn't want it to just be like the Clock was on... >> > >> >-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0- >> >>Why reverse order? >> >> Glotmorf >> >> > >See the comment after the proposal ended... it seemed like an effective >way >to make it different than if the Clock were just on... think of it as the >Administrator's *recognize* box was getting filled up, and he started from >the top. > > >-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0- That...would get really screwy, with people trying to counteract submitted actions with actions that would occur before the already-submitted actions. I strongly recommend keeping it a simple buffered queue. Glotmorf