Glotmorf on 18 May 2002 03:24:48 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: ok dave...


On 5/17/02 at 11:18 PM The Voice wrote:

>>From: "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: ok dave...
>>Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 23:12:30 -0400
>>
>>On 5/17/02 at 11:11 PM The Voice wrote:
>>
>> >{{ __Time Freeze, my butt__
>> >
>> >Amend rule 3 by changing the text,
>> >
>> >"If the Clock is Off, no player may take any game-related actions except
>> >actions which the rules specifically say may be taken while The Clock is
>> >Off."
>> >
>> >To the following:
>> >
>> >"If the Clock is Off, any game-related actions taken by players are
>> >recorded
>> >by the Administrator.  They are then implemented/recognized in reverse
>> >order
>> >of eir recieving them once the Clock is On."
>> >
>> >}}
>> >
>> >Didn't want it to just be like the Clock was on...
>> >
>> >-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-
>>
>>Why reverse order?
>>
>>						Glotmorf
>>
>>
>
>See the comment after the proposal ended... it seemed like an effective
>way
>to make it different than if the Clock were just on... think of it as the
>Administrator's *recognize* box was getting filled up, and he started from
>the top.
>
>
>-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-

That...would get really screwy, with people trying to counteract submitted actions with actions that would occur before the already-submitted actions.  I strongly recommend keeping it a simple buffered queue.

						Glotmorf