RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Wednesday afternoon

["Gavin Doig" <gmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>> Fear not, I intend to appeal this on Monday. (I want to wait for the ballot 
>> results, because hopefully the appeal procedure will be changing).
>>
> -Out of curiosity, why are you appealing it?-
>
"There is no place where a price tag is put on a glass of Champagne." I gather from this that you're saying that one can therefore buy Champagne for 0 points, just as one can buy beer for 5 points. However, that is only the case because the rules say "Players who are in Limbo can buy Beer for five points", which both defines the price and permits the purchase. While there is no price defined for Champagne, there is likewise no method of purchase defined, and it is therefore impossible under r18 (if you're sensible), or rule 393 (otherwise).

Which is not to say your verdict may not be correct, but since you have given no evidence that you've even considered my given analysis, I feel obliged to send this to a higher court.

uin.
-- 
_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup