Gavin Doig on 14 May 2002 16:56:36 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: CFJ 688 |
> CFJ 688 reads: > "Statement: A player may drink a glass of champagne at any time, regardless > of whether any glasses of champagne exist. > > "Analysis: > Rule 503 states "A player may drink a glass of champagne by announcing that > e is doing so in a public forum, this causes it to be destroyed." > Admittedly, the "causes it to be destroyed" clause might *imply* that there > has to be a glass of champagne there, but it doesn't actually seem to be > *required* anywhere (and note that one could certainly drink someone else's > champagne). Common sense would indicate this statement is false, but the > rules take precedence, and they say one may drink." > > Ruling: > After reading the rule in question, I have to, sadly, judge this CFJ to be > TRUE. > > Analysis: > There is no place where a price tag is put on a glass of Champagne. While I > hope that this hole is patched soon, I would also note to uin that, having > drunk in excess of two dozen glasses of bubbly (I counted), e now will be > inebriated for about 20 nweeks, or, with no switches to wtime, 6 months, > real-world. Go ahead, uin, throw a Beer Can. Copper's getting rusty. > > Bottoms up, > BvS > I think my irony meter just overloaded. Although - "in excess of two dozen"? I think not, unless you're counting some from some previous nWeek. uin. -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup