Glotmorf on 12 May 2002 18:35:46 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: requires such dedication. 

On 5/10/02 at 7:10 AM Gavin Doig wrote:

><proosal>
><title>Requires such dedication.</title>
><body>
>[[Sushi simplification; gets rid of the possibility of the sushi-holder
>rendering the gamestate undecidable. Also provides some way to punish
>people who bypass the sushi.]]
>Amend rule 213 by:
>replacing "may not" in the second sentence with "is encouraged not to";
>replacing "may write" with "is encouraged to write";
>replacing the second last paragraph with "Should the Player who has the
>Cursed Sushi of Babel (known also as the Cursed Player) post any message
>to a public Forum without first taking the steps prescribed above, they
>are said to have Denied the Undeniable Sushi.";
>removing the last paragraph [[redunant now]].
>
>Add "Denying the Undeniable Sushi, or attempting to do so by nefarious
>means [[such as concatenating all your message into one long word before
>translating it]]." to the LOGAS.
></body>
></proosal>
>
>uin.

Okay...I admit I've thought about repealing the sushi because there's potentially so many workarounds, but still some amount of effort had to be made.  But if you're gonna make the sushi optional, as long as one is willing to pay the points on it when caught, why not just repeal it altogether?

						Glotmorf