Glotmorf on 10 May 2002 01:15:52 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: cfj 666 |
On 5/9/02 at 8:29 PM Wonko wrote: >Quoth Naath Thabana, > >> Statement: The game has never had an object numbered >> 655. >> >> Analysis: >> >> The Reality Police had the sushi. >> >> The Reality Police's message implies that he sushified >> the text: >> >> ><CFJ><statement<ItcannotbedeterminedwhetherthisstatementappearswithinalegalC >FJ> . >> ></statement><defendant>BaronvonSkippy</defendant><analysis>Ihavethesushi.IfIra >> nth >> >isthroughbabelfishasonebigwordandaddedthewhitespaceafterwards,it'slegal.IfIdid >> n' >> t,it'snot.I'mnottelling.</analysis></CFJ>uin. >> >> then added whitespace and linebreaks. >> >> However sushifying it via Korean produces the text: >> Inside a Korean >> >> sushifying it via French and German produces the text: >> >> >ItcannotbedeterminedwhetherthisstatementappearswithinalegalCFJ.BaronvonSkippyI >> ha >> >vethesushi.IfIranthisthroughbabelfishasonebigwordandaddedthewhitespaceafterwar >> ds >> , it' slegal. IfIdidn' T, it' snot.I' mnottelling.uin. >> >> >> Neither of these two can be turned into the message >> sent by adding only whitespace and linebreaks, >> therefore he failed to operate sushification correctly >> and so the CFJ #655 never existed. >> >> Judgement >> dunno >> >> why? >> >> because I said so! >> I accept that the object labeled CFJ 655 is/was not a >> CFJ, since it wasn't a legal post (on buisness forum >> by player with sushi... unsusified). >> >> Also there is no rule 655. >> >> However I do not know if there has ever been an object >> so numbered in the past. >> >> If I'm stupid, and the system goes, give it the next >> number up and we can only use each number once then >> this CFI is TRUE. > >'dunno' hardly counts as a judgment. But you're right. There was an object >655, because if uin's CFJ was illegal, then I believe the next thing that >gets recognized, be it proposal, rule, or CFJ, must be 655 instead. > >-- >Wonko "Dunno" sounds like "undecided" to me...:) Glotmorf