Wonko on 30 Apr 2002 21:15:34 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Tuesday morning) |
Quoth Glotmorf, > On 4/30/02 at 6:00 AM David E. Smith wrote: > >> As was already pointed out, the Fight Club proposal would have passed by >> the Charter Prop. rules, but the regular voting rules do take precedence. > > Rule 32, that Wonko quoted, talks about props., but Rule 631 doesn't say a > Charter Prop is a prop; it says a Charter Prop is *like* a "normal prop". If > it is only like a "normal prop", but defined on its own, and different from a > "normal prop", then Rule 32 doesn't apply. > Then the rest of rule 32 doesn't apply either - the part about "what's in the proposal becomes part of the ruleset". So if in fact a Charter Prop. is not a normal prop, then it is incapable of changing the ruleset at all. Besides, the Fight Club proposal was proposed before there was such thing as a Charter Prop.; if it wasn't a normal proposal, then it had no business being on the Ballot to begin with. -- Wonko