Glotmorf on 25 Apr 2002 02:16:47 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Re: Judgement on C F J 6-1-5 |
On 4/24/02 at 9:38 PM Wonko wrote: >Quoth Glotmorf, > >> Bathed on the judgment of C F J thicth hundred fifteen, I make thith C F >J: >> >> Wonko could not have changed eir vote latht nweek on my inthta-ruleth >prop. >> >> Therefore, eir vote on it wath "yeth", and voteth on that prop need to be >> counted again. >> >> Glotmorf >> >> (Ith that better, Wonko? :) >> >> > >Which is the CFJ statement? Is it "Wonko could not have changed...." or >"Eir >vote on it wath "yeth"...."? >-- >Wonko Does a statement need to be a single sentence? I'd thought the whole thing collectively was the statement. Glotmorf