Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change t

Jonathan David Amery on 17 Apr 2002 20:59:15 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject.

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject.
From: Jonathan David Amery <jdamery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:59:02 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:49:04 EDT." <200204171649040970.001047A0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020417172717.3409.qmail@xxxxxxxxx> <200204171649040970.001047A0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Which means, one could argue (wouldn't you just love to meet this "one"?),=
>  that CFJs are 100% arbitrary, and therefore meaningless.

 CFJs are usually taken to guide play (precident based ...).

 This does mean that if you have contridictory CFJs you might have to
CFJ again...  

 WC.

References:
- RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject.
  - From: Gavin Doig
- RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject.
  - From: Glotmorf

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Balance II
Next by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The first rule referred to it, you it does not talk,
Previous by thread: RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject.
Next by thread: RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread