Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Flipping the Circuit Breaker

Rob Speer on 16 Apr 2002 01:59:25 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Flipping the Circuit Breaker

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Flipping the Circuit Breaker
From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:59:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <200204152026380840.000BE47B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020415212917.GB2352@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200204152026380840.000BE47B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:26:38PM -0400, Glotmorf wrote:
> Would "concurrent with" rather than "immediately after" work?  Is there anything that says events have to be sequential?

Well, if it's "concurrent with", then does it prevent the person getting
the win at that very moment from winning?

-- 
Rob Speer

References:
- spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Flipping the Circuit Breaker
  - From: Glotmorf

Prev by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Flipping the Circuit Breaker
Next by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: Club Charters
Previous by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Flipping the Circuit Breaker
Next by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: My Dim Ship
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread