Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform

Rob Speer on 15 Apr 2002 04:49:02 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 00:48:59 -0400
In-reply-to: <200204150012040520.005BFE2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <B8DFC66A.11D6%dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200204150012040520.005BFE2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:12:04AM -0400, Glotmorf wrote:
> That's why there are big words for the big thoughts...it saves space to use one big word vs. a bunch of small words.  As for "minister" (quote from prop.), I guess one could use Guy in Charge...Want that in the Straw Poll? :)

Right. And why abbreviate "proposal"? You can say "proposed thing".
-- 
Rob Speer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
  - From: Glotmorf

References:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
  - From: Wonko
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
  - From: Glotmorf

Prev by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
Previous by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Yeti Reform
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread