Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House

Eric Gerlach on 11 Apr 2002 12:37:02 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
From: Eric Gerlach <egerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 08:36:50 -0400
In-reply-to: <E16vcCW-0003AS-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Your message of "Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:41:53 BST." <E16vc1d-00037W-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E16v3rv-0003qB-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E16vc1d-00037W-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

At 11:53 AM 2002-04-11 +0100, you wrote:

 Oops - should've gone to business...

 Any more comments on this?:

 I revise proposal #559 in its entirity to read:

The bad newth ith, you're jutht a tad late with that. You can't revitheafter the ballot hath gone out.... thorry.


Bean

Follow-Ups:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
  - From: Jonathan David Amery

References:
- spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
  - From: Jonathan David Amery

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
Previous by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Upper House
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread