Re: spoon-discuss: Gremlins

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/7/02 at 11:00 AM Wonko wrote:

>Glotmorf said:
>
>>My ruling: FALSE
>
>>The rules cited by Wonko in CFJ533 do in fact exist, since they were
>created by
>proposals that were voted in by the players. However, since those rules
>have
>no declared chutzpah, and are in direct conflict with a rule that has a
>chutzpah of 2, they have no effect. Therefore, the gremlins they claim
>exist
>do not actually exist. Though, since that is not the subject of Wonko's
>statement, that will ether require an Administrator ruling or a new CFJ.
>>
>>This could have been prevented (and can now be fixed) by a self-repealing
>element of the rules in question that states that the Immunity Idol rule
>contains such-and-such a provision.
>
>
>So then the Gremlins exist now, right, because the conflicting sentence of
>293 was erased by the quotation proposal?
>
>
>--Wonko

If that line was erased from r293, then yes, the gremlins would exist, since the now-not-conflicting rules say they do.

						Glotmorf