Donald Whytock on 11 Mar 2002 14:23:06 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Monday morning) |
On 3/11/02 at 8:25 AM Gavin Doig wrote: >> Further review of the list reveals that I did, in fact, overlook a >couple >> of Glotmorf's proposals: "Continued Next Nweek..." is 457/0, and eir >> second Nomilogue is 458/0. (Aside: First, I don't think the rules require >> me to recognize things in the order they're received, and second, I'll >> veto anything that requires me to do so. I am human, y'see, and have no >> real desire to spend a half-hour or more renumbering things every time I >> make a mistake. If you're worried about the PIG, buy him off.) >> >Rule 17: "All recognitions and refusals of recognition must happen in the >same chronological order as the Actions they respond to arrived in a >Public Forum." > >Based on the precedent set by CFJ 280, I'd say that everything since the >admin missed "Continued Next Nweek..." never happened. I'd CFJ this, but I >can't. ;-) (Not that it would matter anyway, as CFJs don't appear to do >anything). > >Therefore, I hereby recognise an Emergency. I fully expect to be the only >person to do so, but nonetheless... anyway, my recognition can always >still be there in the future. > >uin. Not prepared to recognize an Emergency yet, but thank you for your concern. :) As for CFJing...it would be less work for me to CFJ if and only if the PIG eats my proposal, since I might not have to do it (though some other poor slob might). Of course, if I CFJ the PIG's ingestion, the remedy for that would probably be to renumber the proposals, reword the nweek results, update the rules that had been modified by the now-renumbered proposals AND recalculate what proposal the PIG ate, backing out any rule changes the now-ingested proposal caused. Which sounds to me like more work for Mr. A than renumbering the proposals now would be. Glotmorf