Gavin Doig on 13 Feb 2002 16:23:09 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Judgment on CFJ 388

> Ruling: FALSE
> Analysis: Cloudy though the wording of the original rule may be, 
> it seems fairly clear to me that the intention was to use the 
> haiku as an introduction, and the prose paragraph as a full 
> explanation.  The prose paragraph seems clear to me: "earns 10 
> Score points _if the proposal is adopted_" (emphasis mine). 
That may well have been the intention, but I think it's a very poor precedent to use the *intention* of a rule, when than what it actually *says* contradicts it.

Appeal forthcoming (can I do that when the clock is stopped?).


Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at

Win a ski trip!