spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Hopefully completely fathomable CFJ: spoon-discuss: Re: Proosal

[ID Scott <Iain.Scott.01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Gavin Doig wrote:

> That's an interesting argument. It leads to the conclusion that R129 doesn't do anything - legal actions are made legal, and illegal actions can still be CFJed after 1 nweek, as they never happened.

Actually, I think it might require the assumption that it is true in
order to be true, which is perhaps a problem. Perhaps the judge can come
up with something better...

> You know, it feels like you should be able to generate a paradox out of that. ;-)
> 
> It's not how I thought r129 was broken, but I'm not at all sure it's an improvement.

Im sure its not.

cheers,
Iain