Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...

Eric Gerlach on 28 Jan 2002 05:34:14 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
From: Eric Gerlach <egerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:33:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <20020128053108.GA2423@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200201280015180290.0012A7B8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5.1.0.14.0.20020127172629.027a0860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201280015180290.0012A7B8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

At 12:31 AM 2002-01-28 -0500, you wrote:

If you want the Nomic state to be consistent all the time with no
allowance for common sense, proposals would probably have to be
submitted as C code or something.


Maybe we could do C Nomic after we're done with this.  *runs and hides*

Bean

Follow-Ups:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
  - From: Donald Whytock

References:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
  - From: Donald Whytock
- spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
  - From: Greg Ritter
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
  - From: Rob Speer

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Administrative Abilities
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
Previous by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- Okay, but...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread